<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outsourcing CRM &#8211; What a daft idea unless&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidbanes.com/2009/05/13/outsourcing-crm-what-a-daft-idea-unless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidbanes.com/2009/05/13/outsourcing-crm-what-a-daft-idea-unless/</link>
	<description>Mostly about IT security, email, IM and social networking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri Shugaev</title>
		<link>http://www.davidbanes.com/2009/05/13/outsourcing-crm-what-a-daft-idea-unless/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri Shugaev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidbanes.com/?p=528#comment-896</guid>
		<description>Statistics say the most of damage is done by insiders/human error. Therefore protection of the perimeter is useful but not sufficient. I think what we need most is effective granular access management at the content level and it can be done with each model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statistics say the most of damage is done by insiders/human error. Therefore protection of the perimeter is useful but not sufficient. I think what we need most is effective granular access management at the content level and it can be done with each model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Banes</title>
		<link>http://www.davidbanes.com/2009/05/13/outsourcing-crm-what-a-daft-idea-unless/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>David Banes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidbanes.com/?p=528#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Earlier today I tweeted about Google and SalesForce being on the same stand at CeBit Australia - It occurs to me that I wouldn&#039;t want Google buying SalesForce.com if I was using their services!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today I tweeted about Google and SalesForce being on the same stand at CeBit Australia &#8211; It occurs to me that I wouldn&#8217;t want Google buying SalesForce.com if I was using their services!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
